I would keep the AirPort TCs for backup, and use the hardware RAID for photos+music. This is different from previous versions of SoftRAID driver, which Apple first shipped as part of the macOS Installer in 2005 with the introduction of Mac OS X 10.4. With SoftRAID, volumes can use different parts of the same disk, so the first 30-50 of each disk can be used to create a volume of one RAID level, and the remainder of each disk can be used to create a. (2) SoftRAID is for anyone who needs to safely store and backup important data, including audio/video pros, photographers, archivers, families, and small businesses, said Tim. ![]() I would install two disks in a RAID, likely as NAS, duplicating the AirPort TCs. The SoftRAID version 6 driver which Apple ships is not limited in its performance and is able to rebuild RAID volumes normally. With rotating disk drives, the first (or outer) 30-50 of a disk is the fastest part often 1.5 times the speed at the end of the disk. This level of performance isn’t possible in previous versions of the software and is impossible with RAID volumes not using TRIM commands, like Apple RAID. I would still connect the two disks to the two AirPort TCs, but one would be a master, and the other a copy, with rsync running nightly to make a mirror copy. Then I would configure the two new disks as RAID-1 (redundant one mirror copy of the other). I would connect two 3.5" 4TB hard disks, one each to the USB port on each AirPort Time Capsule-leaving the Time Machine disks alone. ![]() I have two Apple AirPort Time Capsules, and I use both for Time Capsule (one is redundant backup) of my main disk on a Macbook Pro. I am offloading my photo and music collection to external drives both collections are still tiny (~250GB each, but 4k video is still young, and internal storage on MacBook Pro won't keep up). It can be difficult to answer a general question, so let me mention a concrete scenario. If RAID is external and in hardware, the combined system will be faster, but this doesn't say anything about usability-before or after the failure of a disk, and especially with third-party products (Apple anyway bailed out from Time Capsule-like products) that are meant for either Mac or PC.Īre there usability advantages to macOS's built-in RAID? (update) Of the two options (RAID in the OS or outside) I'd normally say there is no need to load the OS with more work. ![]() So, if you're a SoftRAID user who depends on a RAID 5 configuration, go ahead and update to the macOS 13.4 for the best experience. Software RAID is just that, while overhead is small, hardware RAID performance will be better. With the release of macOS 13.4 Macs with Apple silicon are as reliable as Intel Macs when accessing SoftRAID RAID 5 volumes. There is no need for external disk enclosures (whether NAS or not) to have RAID. I am assuming you mean Hardware RAID with LVM on Top, vs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |